Skip to main content

Nations in Transit Survey

Go Search
New Atlas
Atlas, A-Z
Atlas Maps
MPP/MPA Programs
Core Topics
Illustrative Courses
Topic Encyclopedia
Concept Dictionary
Career Tips
Best Practices Project

African Development Bank Country Policy and Institutional Assessments
African Economic Outlook
African Governance Report
Asian Barometer Survey
Asian Development Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessments
Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index
Bribe Payers Index
Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey
Business Freedom Component of Index of Economic Freedom
Cingranelli-Richards Human Rights Dataset
CIVICUS Civil Society Index
Commitment to Development Index
Comparative Political Data Sets
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
Compendium of Sustainable Development Indicator Initiatives
Correlates of War Project
Corruption Perceptions Index
Countries at the Crossroads
Country Risk Analyst
Cross-National Indicators of Liberal Democracy
Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive
Dataset of Labor Rights Violations
Democratic Electoral Systems Database
Dow Jones Sustainability World Index
Easterly and Devine Dataset
Economic Freedom of the World Index
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Transition Report
European Crime and Safety Survey
European Protest and Coercion Data
Failed States Index
Foreign Direct Investment Confidence Index
Freedom In The World Report
Gallup World Poll
Gender-Based Development Indices
Global Accountability Project
Global Barometer Study
Global Database of Quotas for Women
Global Integrity Report
Global Peace Index
Human Development Index
IMF Government Finance Statistics
Index of African Governance
Index of Economic Freedom
Institutional Profiles Database
Inter-Parliamentary Union Databases
Media Sustainability Index
Nations in Transit Survey
Opacity Index
Political Terror Scale
Polity Project
Polyarchi Dataset
Press Freedom Index
Prosperity Index
Relative Political Capacity
Transatlantic Trends
UN Social Indicators
UN Surveys on Crime Trends
UN’s Country Assessment in Accountability and Transparency (CONTACT)
Uppsala Conflict Data Program
Urban Governance Index
Voter Turnout Database
Women's Indicators and Statistics Database
World Audit Annual Report
World Factbook
World Governance Assessment
World's Competitiveness Yearbook


Nations in Transit Survey

Summary: Nations in Transit measures progress and setbacks in democratization in 29 countries and territories from Central Europe to the Eurasian region of the Former Soviet Union.

Main Points: The 2006 edition of the annual survey covers events from January 1 through December 31, 2005.

The country reports in Nations in Transit 2006 follow an essay format that allowed the report authors to provide a broad analysis of the progress of democratic change in their country of expertise. Freedom House provided them with guidelines for ratings and a checklist of questions covering seven categories: electoral process; civil society; independent media; national democratic governance; local democratic governance; judicial framework and independence; and corruption.

Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide our readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects. The ratings for all categories reflect the consensus of Freedom House, the Nations in Transit advisers, and the report authors.

Each country report is organized according to the following outline:

·        National Democratic Governance. Considers the democratic character and stability of the governmental system; the independence, effectiveness, and accountability of legislative and executive branches; and the democratic oversight of military and security services.

·        Electoral Process. Examines national executive and legislative elections, electoral processes, the development of multiparty systems, and popular participation in the political process.

·        Civil Society. Assesses the growth of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), their organizational capacity and financial sustainability, and the legal and political environment in which they function; the development of free trade unions; and interest group participation in the policy process.

·        Independent Media. Addresses the current state of press freedom, including libel laws, harassment of journalists, editorial independence, the emergence of a financially viable private press, and Internet access for private citizens.

·        Local Democratic Governance. Considers the decentralization of power; the responsibilities, election, and capacity of local governmental bodies; and the transparency and accountability of local authorities.

·        Judicial Framework and Independence. Highlights constitutional reform, human rights protections, criminal code reform, judicial independence, the status of ethnic minority rights, guarantees of equality before the law, treatment of suspects and prisoners, and compliance with judicial decisions.

·        Corruption. Looks at public perceptions of corruption, the business interests of top policy makers, laws on financial disclosure and conflict of interest, and the efficacy of anticorruption initiatives.

Ratings and Scores

For all 29 countries and territories in Nations in Transit 2006, Freedom House, in consultation with the report authors and a panel of academic advisers, has provided numerical ratings in the seven categories listed above. The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest and 7 the lowest level of democratic progress.

The ratings follow a quarter-point scale. Changes in ratings are based on events during the study year in relation to the previous year. Minor to moderate developments typically warrant a positive or negative change of a quarter (0.25) to a half (0.50) point. Significant developments typically warrant a positive or negative change of three-quarters (0.75) to a full (1.00) point.  It is rare that the rating in any category will fluctuate by more than a full point (1.00) in a single year.

Nations in Transit does not rate governments per se. Nor does it rate countries based on governmental intentions or legislation alone. Rather, a country's ratings are determined by considering the practical effect of the state and nongovernmental actors on an individual's rights and freedoms.

The ratings process for Nations in Transit 2005 involved four steps:

·        Authors of individual country reports suggested preliminary ratings in all seven categories covered by the study.

·        The U.S. and CEE-NIS (Central and Eastern Europe-Newly Independent States) academic advisers evaluated the ratings and reviewed reports for accuracy, objectivity, and completeness of information.

·        Report authors were given the opportunity to dispute any revised rating that differed from the original by more than .50 point.

Freedom House refereed any disputed ratings and, if the evidence warranted, considered further adjustments. Final editorial authority for the ratings rested with Freedom House.

Democracy Score

Starting with the 2004 edition, Freedom House introduced a democracy score, an average of the ratings for all categories covered by Nations in Transit. Freedom House provides the aggregate for comparative and interpretive purposes of evaluating progress and setbacks in the countries under study. Analysis shows a high level of correlation between the previous scoring categories and the new democracy score. Based on the democracy score and its scale of 1 to 7, Freedom House has defined the following regime types:

Democracy Score

Regime Type


Consolidated Democracy


Semi-consolidated Democracy


Transitional Government or Hybrid Regime


Semi-consolidated Authoritarian Regime


Consolidated Authoritarian Regime


Access to database:

Source: Nations in Transit 2006, Methodology

Page Created By:  Madina Junussova. The content presented on this page is drawn directly from the source(s) cited above, and consists of direct quotations or close paraphrases. This material does not necessarily reflect the official view of the publishing organization.

Important Notices
© University of Toronto 2008
School of Public Policy and Governance