Skip to main content

IMF Government Finance Statistics

Go Search
Home
About
New Atlas
Atlas, A-Z
Atlas Maps
MPP/MPA Programs
Subjects
Core Topics
Illustrative Courses
Topic Encyclopedia
Concept Dictionary
Competencies
Career Tips
IGOs
Best Practices Project

African Development Bank Country Policy and Institutional Assessments
African Economic Outlook
African Governance Report
Afrobarometer
Asian Barometer Survey
Asian Development Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessments
Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index
Bribe Payers Index
Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey
Business Freedom Component of Index of Economic Freedom
Cingranelli-Richards Human Rights Dataset
CIVICUS Civil Society Index
Commitment to Development Index
Comparative Political Data Sets
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
Compendium of Sustainable Development Indicator Initiatives
Correlates of War Project
Corruption Perceptions Index
Countries at the Crossroads
Country Risk Analyst
Cross-National Indicators of Liberal Democracy
Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive
Dataset of Labor Rights Violations
Democratic Electoral Systems Database
Dow Jones Sustainability World Index
Easterly and Devine Dataset
Economic Freedom of the World Index
Eurobarometer
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Transition Report
European Crime and Safety Survey
European Protest and Coercion Data
Failed States Index
Foreign Direct Investment Confidence Index
Freedom In The World Report
Gallup World Poll
Gender-Based Development Indices
Global Accountability Project
Global Barometer Study
Global Database of Quotas for Women
Global Integrity Report
Global Peace Index
Human Development Index
IMF Government Finance Statistics
Index of African Governance
Index of Economic Freedom
Institutional Profiles Database
Inter-Parliamentary Union Databases
Latinobarometro
Media Sustainability Index
Nations in Transit Survey
Opacity Index
Political Terror Scale
Polity Project
Polyarchi Dataset
Press Freedom Index
Prosperity Index
Relative Political Capacity
Transatlantic Trends
UN Social Indicators
UN Surveys on Crime Trends
UN’s Country Assessment in Accountability and Transparency (CONTACT)
Uppsala Conflict Data Program
Urban Governance Index
Voter Turnout Database
Women's Indicators and Statistics Database
World Audit Annual Report
World Factbook
World Governance Assessment
World's Competitiveness Yearbook

 
 

IMF Government Finance Statistics (Fiscal Decentralization Indicators)

Summary Advice: The International Monetary Fund’s Government Finance Statistics (GFS) provides data with consistent definitions across countries and years. The purpose of the GFS is to provide data for monitoring, analyzing and evaluating the performance of the general government sectors, in a framework which is applicable across countries with different legal and institutional structures.  The IMF has developed a number of indicators of governance performance using this data. This page describes those indicators which deal with fiscal decentralization that are derived from the IMF's GFS.

Main Points: The GFS covers 149 countries on a yearly basis and is the only data source with such comprehensive coverage, although the number of countries with sub-national data is reduced by about two thirds. The GFS framework distinguishes between state or provincial and local governments, an important distinction in the decentralization context, and it has more than 50 variables for each government tier allowing fairly detailed analysis of fiscal flows between different levels of government.

The GFS framework provides a breakdown of expenditures by function and by economic type. The functional breakdown of expenditures is a useful tool in analyzing sectoral aspects of decentralization.

The breakdown by economic type distinguishes between current and capital expenditures but excludes interest payments. Defense and interest payments are rarely decentralized, and they can potentially distort measures of decentralization, and the GFS contains the necessary information to adjust for this problem.

While various expenditure patterns can be assessed by the GFS data, less can be said about expenditure autonomy. Expenditures that are mandated by the central government appear as sub-national expenditures, even though subnational governments may have no autonomy in these spending decisions. The fiscal decentralization indicators deal with the following topics:

Revenues

GFS revenues can be broken down into tax and non-tax revenue, intergovernmental transfers and other grants. A typical question asked in a decentralization context is how much autonomy do sub-national governments have in raising revenue; for instance how much is collected through shared taxes versus piggybacked taxes versus locally determined taxes? Shared taxes appear as sub-national revenue, although the sub-national government has no autonomy in determining the revenue base or rate, since the GFS reports revenues based on which level of government ultimately receives the revenues.

Vertical Imbalance

Vertical imbalance - or the degree to which subnational governments rely on central government revenues to support their expenditures - can be measured by intergovernmental transfers as a share of sub-national expenditures. This measure does not distinguish what proportion of transfers is conditional versus general purpose, and the GFS data do not provide this information.

Aggregation

Sub-national data in the GFS are aggregated across all governments within the same tier. Regional disparities can be important factors in designing fair and successful decentralization, but the GFS does not provide information for analyzing dispersion among sub-national regions. Thus, there is no basis for evaluating horizontal imbalances, i.e. the dispersion in sub-national governments’ ability to raise local revenues. With respect to vertical imbalance, it is possible that some provinces may have large vertical imbalances, while others are virtually autonomous, but the aggregation of fiscal data prohibits such assessment.

Number of Tiers and Jurisdictions

The number of government tiers and the number of jurisdictions within each tier is an important measure of the structure of subnational government, and has potential implications for service delivery. The GFS framework reflects three tiers, although data are rarely reported for all of these tiers, and, as noted above, they are not disaggregated by jurisdiction. The institutional tables in the GFS Yearbook provide information on the number of tiers and jurisdictions within each tier.

List of Indicators and Formulas used to calculate

The letter and number codes are consistent with those of GFS:

A.I

Total revenues and grants

A.II

Total revenue

A.IV

Tax revenue

A.18

Transfers from other levels of national government

B.I

Total expenditures (=C.II)

B.1

General public services

B.2

Defense

B.3

Public order and safety

B.4

Education

B.5

Health

B.6

Social security and welfare

B.7

Housing and community amenities

B.8

Recreational, cultural, and religious affairs and services

B.9

Fuel and energy

B.10

Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting

B.11

Mining and mineral resources, manufacturing, and construction

B.12

Transportation and communication

B.13

Other economic affairs and services

B.14

Other expenditures

C.II

Total expenditures (=B.I)

C.3.2

Current transfers to other levels of national government

C.7.1.1

Capital transfers to other levels of national government

The squared brackets indicate the level of government:

Cen:

Central Government

Pro:

State or Provincial Government

Loc:

Local Government

Access to database: http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization/fiscalindicators.htm

Source: The International Monetary Fund’s Government Finance Statistics, 2013

http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization/fiscalindicators.htm

Page Created By:  Madina Junussova. The content presented on this page is drawn directly from the source(s) cited above, and consists of direct quotations or close paraphrases. This material does not necessarily reflect the official view of the publishing organization.


Important Notices
© University of Toronto 2008
School of Public Policy and Governance