Skip to main content

Intergovernmental Transfers (in Municipal Finance)

Go Search
Home
About
New Atlas
Atlas, A-Z
Atlas Maps
MPP/MPA Programs
Subjects
Core Topics
Illustrative Courses
Topic Encyclopedia
Concept Dictionary
Competencies
Career Tips
IGOs
Best Practices Project

Ideas in Good Currency
Identity Groups
Ideology
Illiteracy
Immigration
Impact Evaluation
Implementation
Implementation Lenses
Implementation Space
Import Quota
Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI)
Incentive Compatability Constraint
Inclusive Management (in public management)
Income Elasticity of Demand
Income Estimate of Gross Domestic Product
Income Inequality
Income Offer Curve
Income Statement
Increasing Returns to Scale
Incremental Costs (in public management)
Incrementalism in Policy Reform
Indicator
Indifference Curve
Inequality
Inferior Good
Inflation
Influential Observations
Information Economy
Infrastructure
Inherent Right to Self-Government (Aboriginal context)
Initiative
Injunction
Innovation Networks
Inputs
Institutionalism
Instrument Choice
Instrument Design
Intangible Benefits of Programs
Intellectual Capital
Intellectual Property
Interactive Policy Analysis
Interagency Collaboration
Interest Aggregation
Interest Group
Interest Rate Parity
Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers
Intergovernmental Organization
Intergovernmental Relations
Intergovernmental Transfers (in Municipal Finance)
Intermediate Outcome
Internal Audit
Internal Consistency
Internal Expert (in audit)
Internationalization
Intertemporal Choice
Intra-Generational Mobility
Intrastate Federalism
Inverse Demand Function
Invisible Hand
Involuntary Unemployment
Iron Triangle
Isoquant
Isowelfare Curve
Issue Attention Cycle
Issue-Framing
Jensen's Theory of the Firm
Job Rotation
John Henry Effect
Jointly Exhaustive Classification System
Journal Entry
Judicial Activism
Judicial Independence
Judicial Review
Judiciary
Justification
Just-in-time Inventory

 
PPGPortal > Home > Concept Dictionary > I, J > Intergovernmental Transfers (in Municipal Finance)
 

Intergovernmental Transfers 

Transfers from provincial and federal governments to municipalities to cover a portion of operating and capital costs.

(Enid Slack lecture, Fall 2008)

------------------------------------

The vast majority of intergovernmental transfers to municipalities come from the provinces. In 2005, 17.1% of municipal revenues came in the form of transfers, with provincial governments responsible for all but about 1% of that amount. The overall level of transfers to municipalities has also declined in recent years, as they made up 23.1% of municipal revenues in 1990.

There are a range of different types of transfers. While some grants are unconditional – meaning they can be spent as the municipality sees fit – most are conditional, tied to a specific purpose such as transit, infrastructure or education. Conditional grants can also be matching, meaning that the municipality must match the funds put up by the province in order to receive them. These conditional matching grants can either be open-ended or they can be capped, where the province will match only up to a maximum level. Finally, transfers can be allocated for both operating and capital expenses.

There are a number of economic rationales for transfers. They can promote efficiency by subsidizing spillover benefits, such as road networks that connect municipalities. They can promote equity by ensuring that municipalities with smaller tax bases or higher need have the capacity to offer comparable service levels. They can address claims of municipal fiscal imbalance by providing funds to fill gaps in municipal operating budgets (though other options include uploading costs, or granting more revenue generating capacity). Lastly, they can also allow the province to exert control over municipalities by tying conditional transfers to provincial priorities.

At the same time, transfers can also be problematic. They can distort local decision-making and remove the incentive for proper pricing, particularly when a matching grant is the impetus for shifting spending away from one priority to another. In some cases, matching grants can also further disadvantage poor municipalities who cannot afford to spend to receive them. Provincial and federal grants often are not stable or predictable, sometimes forcing municipalities to cover unforeseen shortfalls on little notice.

     

Important Notices
© University of Toronto 2008
School of Public Policy and Governance